1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2011 Fiat Bravo

To start off, 2011 Fiat Bravo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Fiat Bravo (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 145 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2011 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Holden Apollo 2011 Fiat Bravo
Make Holden Fiat
Model Apollo Bravo
Year Released 1992 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1367 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 172 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1205 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2610 mm