1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2011 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2011 Renault Koleos is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Koleos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Koleos (169 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Koleos weights approximately 445 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Holden Apollo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Holden Apollo | 2011 Renault Koleos | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | Apollo | Koleos |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 169 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1855 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1695 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2690 mm |
