1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2011 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2011 Toyota Camry is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Camry (187 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Camry weights approximately 464 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 2011 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | Apollo | Camry |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1669 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4806 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2776 mm |