1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2012 Citroen C3

To start off, 2012 Citroen C3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 3 kg more than 2012 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C3 (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Holden Apollo 2012 Citroen C3
Make Holden Citroen
Model Apollo C3
Year Released 1992 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 172 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1205 kg 1202 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 3870 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2470 mm