1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 404 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (240 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo. 2012 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1992 Holden Apollo has manual transmission. 1992 Holden Apollo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | Apollo | S60 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2776 mm |