1992 Holden Barina vs. 1997 Renault Clio
To start off, 1997 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Barina would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Barina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Barina (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1997 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 1997 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Clio weights approximately 69 kg more than 1992 Holden Barina.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Barina (102 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Clio. (85 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Barina | 1997 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Barina | Clio |
Year Released | 1992 | 1997 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 786 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2550 mm |