1992 Holden Barina vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Barina would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1992 Holden Barina. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Barina.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Barina. (102 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Barina | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Barina | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2640 mm |