1992 Holden Nova vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1992 Holden Nova is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1992 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1385 kg more than 1992 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Holden Nova | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Holden | Lincoln |
| Model | Nova | Continental |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 284 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3210 mm |
