1992 Holden Nova vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1992 Holden Nova is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Nova (81 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Nova weights approximately 105 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Nova | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | Nova | Colt |
Year Released | 1992 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2360 mm |