1992 Holden Nova vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1992 Holden Nova is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Nova (81 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Nova (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Nova | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | Nova | 66 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 56 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |