1992 Holden Nova vs. 1994 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 1994 Lancia Zeta is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,929 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lancia Zeta (89 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1992 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lancia Zeta (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Nova. 1994 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 1992 Holden Nova has manual transmission. 1992 Holden Nova will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Holden Nova | 1994 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Holden | Lancia |
| Model | Nova | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 182 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
