1992 Holden Nova vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster

To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (118 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1992 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Roadster weights approximately 15 kg more than 1992 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Roadster (140 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Nova. 2003 Mazda Roadster has automatic transmission and 1992 Holden Nova has manual transmission. 1992 Holden Nova will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: