1992 Holden Nova vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,422 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Nova (81 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 351 kg more than 1992 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (196 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Nova | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | Nova | Polo |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1366 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2520 mm |