1992 Holden Nova vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Nova would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1992 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 849 kg more than 1992 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Nova. 2005 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1992 Holden Nova has manual transmission. 1992 Holden Nova will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Holden Nova | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Nova | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 147 HP |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1864 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2660 mm |
