1992 Holden Nova vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (105 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1992 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1992 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Nova | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Nova | 3 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 105 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2650 mm |