1992 Holden Nova vs. 2007 Mazda 3
To start off, 2007 Mazda 3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Nova would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 3 (156 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1992 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mazda 3 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1992 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda 3 (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Holden Nova | 2007 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Nova | 3 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 156 HP |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2650 mm |
