1992 Holden Statesman vs. 2003 MCC Smart

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 4,987 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Statesman (223 HP) has 150 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Statesman should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Statesman weights approximately 595 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Statesman (385 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1992 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.

Compare all specifications: