1992 Honda CRX vs. 2001 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2001 Skoda Fabia is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Honda CRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Honda CRX would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Skoda Fabia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Skoda Fabia (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1992 Honda CRX. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 1992 Honda CRX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Skoda Fabia (310 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Honda CRX. (141 Nm). This means 2001 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Honda CRX. 2001 Skoda Fabia has automatic transmission and 1992 Honda CRX has manual transmission. 1992 Honda CRX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Skoda Fabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Honda CRX | 2001 Skoda Fabia | |
| Make | Honda | Skoda |
| Model | CRX | Fabia |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2470 mm |
