1992 Honda Prelude vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Honda Prelude. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Honda Prelude would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Honda Prelude (158 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (154 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Honda Prelude should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda BT-50.

Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Honda Prelude. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Honda Prelude. (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Honda Prelude.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Honda Prelude 2010 Mazda BT-50
Make Honda Mazda
Model Prelude BT-50
Year Released 1992 2010
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2257 cc 2953 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 158 HP 154 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 3200 RPM
Torque 209 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 180 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 96.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 95 mm 102 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 18.0:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 3010 mm