1992 Italdesign Columbus vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1992 Italdesign Columbus is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Italdesign Columbus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Italdesign Columbus (295 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Italdesign Columbus should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Italdesign Columbus (450 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm). This means 1992 Italdesign Columbus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Italdesign Columbus | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Italdesign | Triumph |
| Model | Columbus | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4988 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 130 HP |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 95 mm |
| Vehicle Length | 6000 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2200 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3830 mm | 2700 mm |
