1992 Italdesign Columbus vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Italdesign Columbus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Italdesign Columbus would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Italdesign Columbus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Italdesign Columbus (295 HP) has 260 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Italdesign Columbus should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano.
Because 1992 Italdesign Columbus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Italdesign Columbus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Italdesign Columbus (450 Nm) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 1992 Italdesign Columbus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano. 1992 Italdesign Columbus has automatic transmission and 2009 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2009 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Italdesign Columbus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Italdesign Columbus | 2009 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Italdesign | Tata |
| Model | Columbus | Nano |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4988 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 35 HP |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 6000 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2200 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3830 mm | 2230 mm |
