1992 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 1983 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJ220 weights approximately 72 kg more than 1983 Plymouth Voyager.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Jaguar XJ220 | 1983 Plymouth Voyager | |
| Make | Jaguar | Plymouth |
| Model | XJ220 | Voyager |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3492 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 542 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2860 mm |
