1992 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP) has 310 more horse power than 2005 Lincoln LS. (232 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2005 Lincoln LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 265 kg more than 1992 Jaguar XJ220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lincoln LS. (299 Nm). This means 1992 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Jaguar XJ220 | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Jaguar | Lincoln |
Model | XJ220 | LS |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3492 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 642 Nm | 299 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3030 mm |