1992 Jaguar XJR-15 vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 (450 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 371 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Singer Vogue III weights approximately 42 kg more than 1992 Jaguar XJR-15.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Jaguar XJR-15 | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
Make | Jaguar | Singer |
Model | XJR-15 | Vogue III |
Year Released | 1992 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5993 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 76.2 mm |
Top Speed | 307 km/hour | 148 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 47 L |