1992 Jaguar XJR-15 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR-15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 (450 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR-15. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 (569 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Jaguar XJR-15 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XJR-15 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5993 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 569 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2380 mm |