1992 Jaguar XJR-15 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR-15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 (569 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Jaguar XJR-15 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | XJR-15 | CK |
Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5993 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 569 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Top Speed | 307 km/hour | 270 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |