1992 Jaguar XJR vs. 1997 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1997 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1997 Oldsmobile SS. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1997 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Oldsmobile SS. (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Jaguar XJR | 1997 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XJR | SS |
Year Released | 1992 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5992 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 333 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3650 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1900 mm |