1992 Jaguar XJR vs. 2003 Daewoo Kalos

To start off, 2003 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Kalos. (93 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Kalos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 794 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Kalos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Kalos. (130 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Kalos.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Jaguar XJR 2003 Daewoo Kalos
Make Jaguar Daewoo
Model XJR Kalos
Year Released 1992 2003
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 5992 cc 1399 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 333 HP 93 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 495 Nm 130 Nm
Torque RPM 3650 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 78.5 mm 73.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1824 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1270 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2490 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 89 L 45 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]