1992 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Nissan Altima
To start off, 2005 Nissan Altima is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Altima. (260 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Altima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 337 kg more than 2005 Nissan Altima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Altima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Altima. (334 Nm). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Altima.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Jaguar XJR | 2005 Nissan Altima | |
| Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
| Model | XJR | Altima |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5992 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 333 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1487 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 21.3 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 89 L | 76 L |
