1992 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP) has 259 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 734 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Jaguar XJR | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XJR | Clio |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5992 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 333 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3650 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 21.3 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 89 L | 55 L |
