1992 Jaguar XJR vs. 2011 Audi A3
To start off, 2011 Audi A3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP) has 175 more horse power than 2011 Audi A3. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi A3.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Jaguar XJR | 2011 Audi A3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Audi |
Model | XJR | A3 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5992 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 333 HP | 158 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |