1992 Jaguar XJR vs. 2011 Renault Twingo
To start off, 2011 Renault Twingo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP) has 259 more horse power than 2011 Renault Twingo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Twingo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 904 kg more than 2011 Renault Twingo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Twingo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Twingo. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Twingo. 1992 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 2011 Renault Twingo has manual transmission. 2011 Renault Twingo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Jaguar XJR | 2011 Renault Twingo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XJR | Twingo |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5992 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 333 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3650 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 69.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 89 L | 40 L |
