1992 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 Honda Civic
To start off, 2013 Honda Civic is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2013 Honda Civic. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda Civic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 622 kg more than 2013 Honda Civic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda Civic. (174 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda Civic. 1992 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 2013 Honda Civic has manual transmission. 2013 Honda Civic will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Jaguar XJR | 2013 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Jaguar | Honda |
| Model | XJR | Civic |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5992 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 333 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3650 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4556 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 21.3 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 89 L | 50 L |
