1992 Jaguar XJS vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJS (220 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJS (377 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1992 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Jaguar XJS | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Jaguar | Holden |
Model | XJS | Cruze |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3978 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 377 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2685 mm |