1992 Jaguar XJS vs. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Jaguar XJS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1992 Jaguar XJS has manual transmission. 1992 Jaguar XJS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Jaguar XJS | 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XJS | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 210 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4775 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2781 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |