1992 Jaguar XJS vs. 2011 BMW Z4
To start off, 2011 BMW Z4 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW Z4 (335 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1992 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 1992 Jaguar XJS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 BMW Z4 has automatic transmission and 1992 Jaguar XJS has manual transmission. 1992 Jaguar XJS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 BMW Z4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Jaguar XJS | 2011 BMW Z4 | |
Make | Jaguar | BMW |
Model | XJS | Z4 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 335 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4242 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1285 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2497 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 55 L |