1992 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 1998 Panoz Q9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Panoz Q9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 377 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Jeep Cherokee. (301 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Jeep Cherokee. 1998 Panoz Q9 has automatic transmission and 1992 Jeep Cherokee has manual transmission. 1992 Jeep Cherokee will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Panoz Q9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Jeep Cherokee | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
Make | Jeep | Panoz |
Model | Cherokee | Q9 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |