1992 Lada Samara vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1992 Lada Samara is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,288 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Lada Samara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Lada Samara weights approximately 110 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 1980 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Lada Samara | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Samara | 323 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2320 mm |