1992 Lada Samara vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1992 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 209 kg more than 1992 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Lada Samara | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Samara | 6 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2680 mm |