1992 Lada Samara vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1992 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1992 Lada Samara.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Lada Samara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Lada Samara | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Lada | Citroen |
| Model | Samara | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1288 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 98 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
