1992 Lada Samara vs. 2011 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Lada Samara would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1992 Lada Samara. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1992 Lada Samara.

Because 2011 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Lada Samara. (98 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Lada Samara. 2011 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1992 Lada Samara has manual transmission. 1992 Lada Samara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: