1992 Lotec Testa de Oro vs. 1994 Plymouth Colt

To start off, 1994 Plymouth Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro would be higher. At 4,943 cc, 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro (750 HP) has 638 more horse power than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (112 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro should accelerate faster than 1994 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro weights approximately 425 kg more than 1994 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Plymouth Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro (900 Nm) has 743 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm). This means 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Plymouth Colt.

Compare all specifications: