1992 Lotec Testa de Oro vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro would be higher. At 4,943 cc, 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 271 kg more than 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro (900 Nm) has 500 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo XC60. (400 Nm). This means 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo XC60. 2010 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro has manual transmission. 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Lotec | Volvo |
| Model | Testa de Oro | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4943 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 750 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 900 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1921 kg |
