1992 Lotus Elan vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1992 Lotus Elan is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Lotus Elan weights approximately 200 kg more than 1977 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Lotus Elan | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Lotus | Volvo |
Model | Elan | 66 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1106 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1390 mm |