1992 Mahindra Armada vs. 1983 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1992 Mahindra Armada is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. Both 1992 Mahindra Armada and 1983 Mercury Cougar are equipped with a 2,300 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 520 kg more than 1983 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1992 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mahindra Armada | 1983 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Mahindra | Mercury |
Model | Armada | Cougar |
Year Released | 1992 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5140 mm |