1992 Mahindra Armada vs. 2003 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2003 Toyota Corolla is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Corolla (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1992 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1992 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 990 kg more than 2003 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1992 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Toyota Corolla. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mahindra Armada | 2003 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4390 mm |
