1992 Mahindra Armada vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1992 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1992 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 284 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 1992 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mahindra Armada | 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Mahindra | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Armada | CLK |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1716 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4640 mm |
