1992 Mazda 121 vs. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1992 Mazda 121 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 735 kg more than 1992 Mazda 121.
Because 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda 121 | 1981 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | 121 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1324 cc | 4097 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2750 mm |
