1992 Mazda 121 vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (387 HP) has 315 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 121. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 121.
Because 2009 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Falcon (520 Nm) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 121. (105 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 121 | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 121 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 387 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 520 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 68 L |