1992 Mazda 121 vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 121 (72 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 121 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 121 | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 121 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |